Home>Products>NSK Bearing>146,05 mm x 241,3 mm x 56,642 mm NSK 82576/82950 cylindrical roller bearings
NSK 82576/82950 MODELS
Need a CAD or 3D Model?
146,05 mm x 241,3 mm x 56,642 mm NSK 82576/82950 cylindrical roller bearings
category
NSK Bearing
NSK 82576/82950 Bearing SPECIFICATIONS
We work closely with our AMERICAN BEARING MFG.CORP. 146,05 mm x 241,3 mm x 56,642 mm NSK 82576/82950 cylindrical roller bearings 2600 rpm Oil Speed Rating n2 manufacturing 146,05 mm x 241,3 mm x 56,642 mm partners to bring the best value to customers.
- NSK
82576/82950
- 286000 N
- 2600 rpm
- 76.00 mm
- 235.0000 mm
- 150.000 mm
- 2100 rpm
- 2.00 mm
- 400000 N
-
AMERICAN BEARING MFG.CORP.2020-07-10 09:46:19
Welcome to my shop! Glad to serve you! Please send your question!
146,05 mm x 241,3 mm x 56,642 mm NSK 82576/82950 cylindrical roller bearingsTechnology
- 286000 N
- 2600 rpm
- 76.00 mm
- 235.0000 mm
- 150.000 mm
- 2100 rpm
- 2.00 mm
- 400000 N
- 1.00 mm
- 146,05 mm x 241,3 mm x 56,642 mm
NSK 82576/82950 146,05 mm x 241,3 mm x 56,642 mm NSK 82576/82950 cylindrical roller bearingsDetails
NSK 82576/82950 bearing Size Chart (mm/inches) | |
---|---|
A | 48 mm |
A1 | 25 mm |
B | 25 mm |
B1 | 38 mm |
d | 25 mm |
d1 | 45 mm |
E | 18 mm |
G | M6x1 |
H | 42.9 mm |
H1 | 13 mm |
H2 | 84 mm |
J | 66 mm |
L | 94 mm |
L1 | 30 mm |
N | M14 |
s1 | 20.5 mm |
Z | 18 mm |
C | 19.5 kN |
C0 | 11.2 kN |
T min. | -20 °C |
T max. | 100 °C |
Weight | 1.08 kg |
Adapter sleeve reference | H2306 |
Designation of housing | PA206N- |
Designation of bearing | UK206G2H |
NSK 82576/82950 INTERCHANGE
NSK Bearing Part series 82576/82950 is a potential replacement for these common bearing part numbers:
82576/82950
82576/82950
82576/82950
82576/82950
82576/82950
82576/82950
82576/82950
82576/82950
Contact Us

- AMERICAN BEARING MFG.CORP.
- Address9515 Winona Avenue, Schiller Park, lL 60176, U.S.A.
- Phone(Working Time)671-2659
- Fax
NSK 82576/82950 Technical Articles
Can a bad wheel bearing cause brake problems? |
Do you grease sealed bearings? |
What causes rod bearings to fail? |